A study on the frequency of violence to healthcare professionals in a mental health hospital and related factors
Nurdan Kocabiyik, Serap Yildirim, Emel Ozturk Turgut, Melek Kayaci Turk, Ahmet Ayer
Article No: 3   Article Type :  Research
Objective: The research was carried out to investigate the violence situations that health staff in a mental health hospital is exposed to and the effective factors regarding those situations.

Method: This descriptive study was carried out with 178 healthcare provider working in Manisa Mental Health Hospital, who accepted to participate in the study between March and May 2011. A questionnaire form that was designed by the researchers was used for data collection. Number-percentage distribution and chi-square methods were used for analysis.

Results: Among healthcare providers, 73% were exposed to violence in their workplace; 51.1% were exposed to physical violence, 51.1% were exposed to verbal violence, 87.2% were exposed to violence by patients and 39.8% did not react after the act of violence.

Conclusion: It was found that a great majority of healthcare providers were exposed to violence. Physical and verbal violence were the most common type of violence, the offenders of violence were mostly patients whereas the victims of the violence were mostly nurses as well as the staff working in contained wards. Investigating violence risk factors in psychiatric work environment, implementing an effective and systematically working security system, training of employees about the management of violence, improving the recording procedures for violence events, and developing written policies were suggested.
Keywords : Health staff, mental health hospital, violence
Dusunen Adam : The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences : 2015;28:112-118
Full Text:

INTRODUCTION

Violence, as old as the history of humankind, is difficult to define because of its complexity. Violence, with its many different manifestations, is described by International Labor Organization (ILO), International Community of Nurses (ICN) and World Health Organization (WHO). Any physical attack or intimidation applied to a person or a group of people to harm the physical, intellectual, mental, ethical and social development of the targeted party is described as violence. Violence to healthcare providers can be defined as any behavioral and verbal intimidation or physical and sexual attack generated by the patient, relatives of the patient or any third party that creates a risk for the healthcare professional (1-7).

Violence to healthcare providers has become a globally increasing problem (2-7). Therefore, this topic has taken an increasing attention in recent years and numerous researches have been carried out. Many studies conducted on the healthcare professionals strikingly display the experienced violence. As a common point of all the scientific research, healthcare service is a structured and labor-intensive area, where violence is highly prevalent due to the nature and structure of the field. Moreover, it is observed that nurses and physicians are exposed to violence more than any other healthcare professional, verbal and physical violence is widely seen in medical services and physical aggressors are usually the patients or their relatives. Besides, it is reported that healthcare providers are widely anxious about being subject to violence (2,8-12).

Violence to healthcare providers may be experienced anywhere in a healthcare center. Nonetheless, psychiatry clinics are among the places where violence is seen the most (5). Findings of two studies conducted in a mental health hospital in our country showed that healthcare professionals and especially nurses are drastically exposed to violence (3,7). It is observed that findings of studies in other countries (6,13,14) are in consistency with ours; and besides this, it has been detected in some studies that in-ward violence events were not reported (15,16).

Violence to healthcare providers adversely affects the therapeutic ambience that supports the patients’ self-respect and self-confidence, improves the communication and interaction skills and set them out for social environment. It is observed that people quit doing their job and discontinuation, service related mistakes as well as stress increase and anger, depression, fatigue, dread and anxiety are felt because of violence, which in turn leads to loss in quality of service provided by healthcare professionals and lesser total quality (3,5,10,16-24).

It is apparent that, violence to healthcare providers in psychiatry clinics has negative consequences on both the healthcare professionals and the patients (3,7,12). Thence, detection of workplace risks associated with violence and taking preventive precautions as well as profiling the conditions and features of violence to healthcare providers in healthcare institutions is considered crucial. Starting from this ground, this study was carried out in order to assess the frequency and contributing factors of violence to healthcare providers working in a mental health hospital.

METHOD

This descriptive study was carried out with the healthcare professionals working in a mental health hospital between March-May 2011. Our sample is consisting of 178 healthcare professionals who has been employed in the institution at the time of research and accepted to participate in the study.

Data were collected by using a form designed by the investigators. The data collection form is consisting of 3 sections and 15 items (two questions for identification, four questions for occupational profiling and nine questions about violence history of the healthcare professional).

Data collection form was dispensed to the healthcare providers participating in the study after having the ethical committee approval and implementation allowance. The participants were informed about the study and convinced about using the data only for research purposes and keeping IDs confidential. Out of 318 data collection forms distributed to the participants, 252 were retrieved. Sixty-six forms were excluded for being incompletely filled and 178 were included into the study.

Number-percentage method was used for evaluation of the data while Chi-square test was applied for analyses.

RESULTS

In reference to the sociodemographic data of the participants collected and sorted out, 40.8% were 31-38 years old and 69.1% were female. In particular of occupational profile of participants, 4.1% were physician, 4.7% were psychologist, 10% were health technician, 14.1% were utility server and 10% were other (Table 1, 2).

In Table 2, distribution of exposure to violence in terms of occupational status is given. Tabulated data reveals that nurses (χ2=29.13, p<0.01) and employees of contained services (χ2=17.80, p<0.01) are the most exposed groups.

Evaluation of violence history data revealed that 73% of the participants were exposed to violence, 68.8% came under violence in the last one-year time, 80.3% had an exposure frequency of 1-4, 87.2% had a violence generated by relatives of patients and 85.4% were exposed to violence while working in the place of duty (Table 3).

For the description of diagnoses and type of violence generated by patients, line percentage values were referred. The data displayed that 48.3 of the hospitalized cases had the diagnosis of schizophrenia, 51.1% of the violence events were of physical and 51.1% were verbal (Table 3). Of those physical attacks, 63.2% were beating, 31% were truculence, 2.3% were laceration, 2.3% were grabbing of upper extremities and 1.1% was biting. The breakdown of emotional violence events were 58.3% pitying and 41.7% crying. Among verbal violence events, 53.5% were insulting, 37.6% were cursing and 8.9% were coercion. In the category of sexual violence, 52.4% were touching, 28.6% were explicit talking, 14.3% were attempting to kiss and 4.8% were indecent exposure.

39.1% of the healthcare professionals who were exposed to violence reported worry and perplexity, 39.8% did nothing, 32% sought medical help (Table 3). None of them informed the management of the institution they work for, after exposure (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

There are plenty of descriptive studies about healthcare professionals exposed to violence (2,9-12,25-28). Moreover, studies aiming description of violence exposure of healthcare professionals working in psychiatry departments (3,7,24,29-31) were carried out. It is reported in studies with various rates that healthcare professionals were exposed to violence at least once within the last one year (2,3,7,14,18,32). The findings of this study are in conformance with those reported in the literature and violence applied to healthcare professionals was observed to remain in the course of years. Besides, when evaluated, the related studies demonstrated that the most frequently applied types of violence to healthcare professionals were verbal and physical, sexual violence was not scarce (3,7,14,24) and aggressors are usually the patients and/or their relatives (6,7,14,29,30).

The most frequently exposed professionals in our study were nurses. In comparable studies, the leading group of professionals exposed to violence was reported as nurses and among physicians, those who work in psychiatry departments were exposed to violence at peak. Being in contact with patients more and longer than any other healthcare professional as well as their potential to face the service-related crises directly make the nurses the most vulnerable healthcare professionals to aggressive patients (2,3,7,9,15,33-37). In conjunction with this fact, training the psychiatric nurses about the management of aggression is considered important for the workplace safety. On the other hand, in some studies, the professional experience of healthcare providers was regarded as a risk factor for violence (2,9). However, although 76.9% of our sample has been serving in the same institution for 1-6 years, no significant difference with other groups was detected.

In the study, the contained service was found to be significantly the most exposed workplace. Patients with severe symptoms, lacking cognitive and behavioral control, who are in acute phase of the illness, exist in contained services. Patients with excitation in acute phase are reported in the literature to be the most risky group for attacking and generating violence (4). In light of this knowledge, it is thought that personnel of the contained services are the most vulnerable to aggression and violence and therefore, people who work in contained services have to be more cautious.

In the study, it was recorded that the healthcare professionals who were exposed to violence, usually feel perplexity and worry, in addition to apathy, anger and apprehension. In studies carried out about the matter workplace violence was observed to cause negative affect and lead to psychological problems in the long term. The study by Gokce and Dundar (3) that had been conducted in the mental health hospital in Samsun demonstrated the progressively increasing anxiety associated with exposure to violence. The study carried out by Inoue et al. (13) on nurses who were exposed to violence showed that violence influenced the nurses adversely whereas the family support contributed to their psychological state. Kindy et al. (22) displayed that the nurses, who were applied violence, failed to feel the workplace conditions safe but feel depressed, highly excitable, and unsafe and have been afraid of interacting with patients. Consistently, Bilgin and Buzlu (33) recorded that almost half of the psychiatry nurses have not been feeling themselves safe in the workplace and a majority of them have remained anxious about being exposed to violence (3,13,22,33). There are references reporting depression, psychological trauma and increased performance anxiety after being exposed to violence (5) while some others mention about shock, anger, depression, apprehension, tension and weakness (19). Workplace violence is observed to affect the whole life. Thus, it is thought that the healthcare providers who were applied violence should get psychological consultancy and support.

In the study, it was detected that 32% of the healthcare professionals who were exposed to violence sought for medical care but made no formal notification. Evaluation of related literature revealed that healthcare providers and especially those who work in psychiatry departments, rarely report about violence events and usually stayed silent (7,15,16,34). In a study made to assess the frequency and intensity of aggression in a psychiatry clinic, Brizer et al. (15) recorded that only a very few violence cases were reported. In the same study, the grounds for the exposed professionals not to report the event are listed as follows: “would be overriding the patient’s rights”, “the patient cannot be blameworthy”, “the patient would be agitated because of notification” and “this is the natural consequence of dealing with that type of patients”. In consideration of all of these justifications, it becomes rather difficult to assess the frequency and intensity of such violence events and to get the statistics in this field.

In the study, it was observed that the majority of healthcare professionals were exposed to violence, the most frequently applied types violence were verbal and physical, the aggressor was generally the patient, and the most exposed professionals were nurses and those who work in contained services. It can be recommended that patients with high risk of violence should be pre-determined and healthcare providers should be trained about self-protection. Moreover, it was recorded that healthcare professionals who were applied violence, had negative feelings afterwards but did not report violence. Therefore, informing the healthcare providers about the importance of reporting for better detection, correction and prevention of risky situations can be advised. Supportive approach of institutional management is important as well. Medical and psychological care and treatment for exposed professionals might help cope with the negative affect associated with violence.

It is obvious that healthcare providers working in psychiatry services are at risk of violence. However, in recent years, the increasing prevalence of violence applied to healthcare professionals is a fact in our country, as mentioned in the media. Even though the psychiatry services are known to be at high risk, we should not ignore that the psychiatric patients and their relatives are not the only aggressors.

REFERENCES

1. WHO. Joint Programme on Workplace Violence in the Health Sector. Framework guidelines for addressing workplace violence in the health sector. First ed. Geneva: International Labour Office, 2002.

2. Ayranci U, Yenilmez C, Gunay Y, Kaptanoglu C. The frequency of being exposed to violence in the various health institutions and health profession groups. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry 2002; 3:147-154. (Turkish)

3. Gokce T, Dundar C. The frequency of exposing to violence and its effects on state and trait anxiety levels among the doctors and nurses working in Samsun Psychiatry Hospital. Journal of Inonu University Medical Faculty 2008; 15:25-28. (Turkish)

4. Hariri AG. All about violence in Psychiatry: A review. RCHP 2009; 3:21-29. (Turkish)

5. CDC. Violence: occupational hazards in hospitals. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2002-101/. Date of Access: November 18, 2014.

6. Merecz D, Rymaszewska J, Mościcka A, Kiejna A, Jarosz-Nowak J. Violence at the workplace--a questionnaire survey of nurses. Eur Psychiatry 2006; 21:442-450.

7. Coskun S, Ozturk AT. Evaluation of the Assaults Experienced By Nurses in Bakirkoy Mental Hospital. Maltepe University e-Journal of Nursing Science & Art 2010; 3:16-23. (Turkish)

8. Healthcare and Social Service Providers’ Syndicate (SAGLIK-SEN). Violence to Healthcare Providers Study. Ankara: Saglik-Sen Genel Merkezi, 2013. http://www.sagliksen.org.tr/MediaContent/buMY-1389703092-fsmf.pdf. Date of Access: November 18, 2014. (Turkish)

9. Ayranci U, Yenilmez C, Balci Y, Kaptanoglu C. Identification of violence in Turkish health care settings. J Interpers Violence 2006; 21:276-296.

10. Eker HH, Ozder A, Tokac M, Topcu I, Tabu A. Aggression and violence towards health care providers, and effects thereof. Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy 2012; 4:19-29.

11. Camci O, Kutlu Y. Determination of workplace violence toward health workers in Kocaeli. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing 2011; 2:9-16. (Turkish)

12. Hahn S, Zeller A, Needham I, Kok G, Dassen T, Halfens RJG. Patient and visitor violence in general hospitals: a systematic review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior 2008; 13:431-441.

13. Inoue M, Tsukano K, Muraoka M, Kaneko F, Okamura H. Psychological impact of verbal abuse and violence by patients on nurses working in psychiatric departments. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2006; 60:29-36.

14. Nolan P, Soares J, Dallender J, Thomsen S, Arnetz B. A comparative study of experiences of violence of English and Swedish mental health nurses. Int J Nurs Stud 2001; 38:419-426.

15. Brizer DA, Crowner ML, Convit A, Volavka J. Videotape recording of inpatient assaults: a pilot study. Am J Psychiatry 1988; 145:751-752.

16. Turkish Medical Association. Coping with Violence. Second Ed. Ankara: Hermes Tanitim ve Ofset, 2013. http://www.ttb.org.tr/kutuphane/siddetbr_13.pdf. Date of Access: November 19, 2014. (Turkish)

17. van Leeuwen ME, Horte JM. Violence aganist care workers in psychiatry: is prosecution justified? Int J Law Psychiatry 2011; 34:317-323.

18. Arnetz JE, Arnetz BB. Violence towards health care staff and possible effects on the quality of patient care. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52:417-427.

19. ICN – International Council of Nurses. Guidelines on coping with violence in the workplace. Geneva: Imprimerie Fornara, 2007. http://www.icn.ch/images/stories/documents/publications/guidelines/guideline_violence.pdf. Date of Access: November 18, 2014.

20. ICN - International Council of Nurses. International Nurses’ Day, nurses always there for you: United against violence. Anti violence tool kit. Geneva: ICN, 2001. http://www.bvsde.paho.org/bvsacd/cd41/nurses.pdf. Date of Access: November 18, 2014.

21. Hofling KC, Leininger MM (1960). Basic psychiatric concepts in nursing. Kumral A (Translation Editor). First Ed. Istanbul: Vehbi Koc Foundation, 1981.

22. Kindy D, Petersen S, Parkhurst D. Perilous work: nurses’ experiences in psychiatric units with high risks of assault. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2005; 19:169-175.

23. Oflaz F. Therapeutic milieu in a psychiatric ward and the responsibilities of nurses. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry 2006; 7:55-61. (Turkish)

24. Zeng JY, An FR, Xiang YT, Qi YK, Ungvari GS, Newhouse R, Yu DS, Lai KY, Yu LY, Ding YM, Tang WK, Wu PP, Hou ZJ, Chiu HF. Frequency and risk factors of workplace violence on psychiatric nurses and its impact on their life in China. Psychiatry Res 2013; 2010:510-514.

25. Karaahmet E, Bakim B, Altinbas K, Peker E. Evaluation of assaults on doctors in Canakkale within the last year. Dusunen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences 2014; 27:108-114.

26. Altinbas K, Altinbas G, Turkcan A, Oral ET, Walters J. A survey of verbal and physical assaults towards psychiatrists in Turkey. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2011; 57:631-636.

27. Pinar T, Pinar G. Healthcare workers and workplace violence. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin 2013: 12:315-326. (Turkish)

28. Annagur B. Violence towards health care staff: risk factors, aftereffects, evaluation and prevention. Current Approaches In Psychiatry 2010; 2:161-173. (Turkish)

29. Dhumad S, Wijeratne A, Treasaden I. Violence against psychiatrists by patients: survey in a London mental health trust. Psychiatric Bulletin 2007; 31:371-374.

30. Grassi L, Biancosino B, Marmai L, Kotrotsiou V, Zanchi P, Peron L, Marangoni C, Vanni A, Barbui C. Violence in psychiatric units: a 7-year Italian study of persistently assaultive patients. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2006; 41:698-703.

31. Hatch-Maillette MA, Scalora MJ. Gender, sexual harassment, workplace violence, and risk assessment: convergence around psychiatric staff’s perceptions of personal safety. Aggression and Violent Behavior 2002; 7:271-291.

32. Bilgin H, Keser Ozcan N. Aggression in psychiatry wards. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing 2012; 3:42-47. (Turkish)

33. Bilgin H, Buzlu S. A study of psychiatric nurses’ beliefs and attitudes about work safety and assaults in Turkey. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2006; 27:75-90.

34. Duxbury J, Whittington R. Causes and management of patient aggression and violence: staff and patient perspectives. J Adv Nurs 2005; 50:469-478.

35. Cam O, Pektas I. Reflecting in the nursing of violence. Turkish Journal of Forensic Psychiatry 2005; 2:3-8. (Turkish)

36. Parlar S. A problem that is not considering in health workers: healthy work environment. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin 2008; 7:547-554. (Turkish)

37. Ozturk A. A Study on the definition of intervention technics for individual defence and aggression in Psychiatry: the example of Bakirkoy. Archives of Neuropsychiatry 2012; 49:86-91. (Turkish)

SUBMIT AN ARTICLE
11th National Alcohol and Substance Abuse Congress
DUSUNEN ADAM BROCHURES
COVER
Creative Commons Lisansı

Dusunen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi
Bakırköy Prof. Dr. Mazhar Osman Ruh Sağlığı ve Sinir Hastalıkları Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
Yayıncı
Yerküre Tanıtım ve Yayıncılık Hizmetleri A.Ş.